- Division of Environmental Analysis
- SER Home
- Purpose of the SER
- How To Use The SER - Printing Problems? Site Organization; Trouble with Acrobat Reader
- Topics Matrices
- Env Handbooks
- Vol 1: General -
Topics Chapters
- Vol 2: Cultural - Overview
- Chapter 1-- General Information
- Chapter 2 – Cultural Resources Procedures
- Chapter 3 – Native American Cultural Studies
- Chapter 4 – Cultural Resources Identification
- Chapter 5 – Prehistoric Archaeological Resources: Evaluation and Treatment
- Chapter 6 – Historical Archaeological Resources: Evaluation and Treatment
- Chapter 7 – Built Environment Cultural Resources: Evaluation and Treatment
- Exhibits
- Cultural Resources Templates
- Vol 3: Biological
- Vol 4: Community
- Storm Water
- Emergency Projects Environmental Process and Requirements
- Other Guidance
- Forms & Templates
- Policy Memos
- MOUs/MOAs
- Scoping Tools
- Training On Demand
- Acronyms and Abbreviations List
- Glossary
- ADA
- Contact SER Staff
- Questions about the SER?
- Caltrans staff - contact the Environmental Coodinator for your district.
- Local agency staff - contact the Caltrans
Local Assistance Engineer for your district.
- Suggestions or problems with this site, email the website coordinator or use the suggestion form.
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view and print PDF files. Adobe Acrobat is required to edit online forms and save them to your computer.

Last Updated: Friday, February 3, 2012 11:30 AM
EXHIBIT 5.12 Post Review Discovery — without Plan Format and Content Guide
- Introduction
- Post Review Archaeological Discovery Actions
- Initial Response and Notifications
- Subsequent Actions and Reporting
- Required Reporting
- Peer Review
Introduction
It is possible to conduct a reasonable and good faith effort to identify historic properties during the planning phase of a project and still encounter previously unrecorded archaeological resources during the project’s implementation. If a plan for subsequent discovery is not in place and an undertaking affects a previously unidentified property or affects a known historic property in an unanticipated manner, Caltrans shall promptly stop construction activity in the vicinity of the property and implement all reasonable measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate further harm to the property. The regulatory context for post review archaeological discoveries is found at in the Section 106 Programmatic Agreement1 (Section 106 PA) Stipulation XV.B and 36 CFR 800.13(b). The following information is provided to assist with unplanned archaeological discoveries that occur during the implementation of an undertaking.
Post Review Archaeological Discovery Actions
If buried cultural materials are encountered during construction, it is Caltrans policy that work stop in that area until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the find.
If there is a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) or other type of agreement document in place for the project, follow protocols stipulated in the document.
Initial Response and Notifications
When previously unknown cultural resources are identified or unplanned effects occur during the implementation of a project, the main goal is to take action that will avoid or minimize further harm to the resources and to ensure that the appropriate parties are notified of the discovery. This requires careful coordination with construction personnel and Caltrans staff. The following sequence is intended as guidance; however, it does not replace good judgment in the field, which may be necessary to appropriately respond to a particular situation:
- Construction personnel, or the person making the discovery, immediately stops work in the vicinity of the find and coordinates with the Resident Engineer to ensure the find is protected from further harm
- A qualified archaeologist immediately conducts a field inspection to determine the nature of the find
- Upon determination that the find is archaeological in nature, the archaeologist notifies the following parties, as follows:
Immediately notify:
- Caltrans District Environmental Branch Chief (EBC)
- District Native American Coordinator (DNAC) as appropriate
- County coroner when human remains (or remains reasonably suspected of being human) are encountered
If human remains (or remains reasonably suspected of being human) are encountered, Health and Safety Code §7050.5 requires that construction or excavation be stopped in the vicinity of the discovery and the county coroner be notified. The coroner will determine if the remains are Native American. In compliance with Public Resources Code §5097, if the remains are determined to be Native American, the coroner notifies the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC then must notify the person designated by them to be the Most Likely Descendent (MLD). The Caltrans DNAC also directly notifies the NAHC and contacts the designated MLD in order to ensure that lines of communication are quickly established. - Within 48 hours the EBC then will notify, as appropriate:
- Caltrans Cultural and Community Studies Office (CCSO) 2
- State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO)
- Property owner (if other than Caltrans)
- Indian tribes (or Native American groups that may attach religious or cultural significance to the affected property)
- Secretary of the Interior and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation when unplanned effects involve a National Historic Landmark. See the Section 106 PA Stipulation XV.B.3.
- Other consulting parties
The Caltrans District EBC may delegate notification responsibility to the Caltrans project archaeologist, District Heritage Resources Coordinator (HRC), or DNAC as appropriate.
The notification must include a description of the nature and location of the find and actions that are being taken to protect the find.
These parties have 72 hours to respond to the notification. Reponses from any of the parties above within the initial 72-hour period may include recommendations for further action and treatment or requests for more information, such as maps, photos, more detailed descriptions of the find, and requests for field visits or inspections by additional parties.
Note that when making initial contact (within 48 hours of the find) every effort should be made to insure a personal contact is made. For example, do not rely solely on a fax or single e-mail message. Follow up faxes or emails up with phone calls or additional e-ails to ensure the notification was received.
Subsequent Actions and Reporting
To minimize construction delays and facilitate appropriate consultation regarding treatment of the affected resource, it is critical to follow-up on any requests for additional information, maintain communication with appropriate parties, and check in with progress updates and documentation as work is completed.
Initial documentation should be completed, including maps, photos, GPS data, and field drawings, as appropriate. This documentation may be required before the other consulting parties can be expected to provide informed comment.
Subsequent actions such as protective measures and data recovery efforts must be developed in consideration of the comments of parties identified above.
Note that while considerable time may pass before reports of work undertaken may be available, it is critical to maintain communication with consulting parties and follow through on commitments.
Required Reporting
Federal Undertakings
- Complete a Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR form 523) form(s) (Caltrans DPR form templates are available online) and submit the form(s) to the appropriate regional Information Center to obtain a Primary Number. The DPR 523 form(s) may need to be included with any information that is sent to consulting parties immediately following the initial notification, in order to obtain meaningful comments and input towards resolution of effects.
- Complete any agreed-upon reports that are part of the consultation to resolve adverse effects. Typically this will include a Phase III Report (see Exhibit 5.8) if data recovery is required.
- Provide a Report of Construction Impacts to the Headquarters Division of Construction and to the CCSO Chief, as outlined in Exhibit 5.13.
- Coordinate with the CCSO Section 106 Branch Chief to include information on the post review discovery and actions taken in the Section 106 PA Annual Report.
CEQA
When there is a post-review discovery on a state-only project, follow the guidance outlined above, but the SHPO, FHWA, ACHP and Secretary of the Interior (for National Historic Landmarks) do not need to be notified. Use the Historical Resources Compliance Report (HRCR) to document the steps taken under the Reporting Required section above. Chapter 2 Section 2-8.1 Late Discoveries also contains information.
Public Resources Code Section 5024
When there is a post-review discovery that involves a state-owned resource, follow the guidance outlined above, but FHWA, ACHP and Secretary of the Interior (for National Historic Landmarks) do not need to be notified. If the post-review discovery involves an unrecorded archaeological site, and Caltrans Professionally Qualified Staff (PQS) determine that the site meets National Register or California Historical Landmark (CHL) criteria, SHPO must be notified pursuant to Public Resources Code §5024(f). Use the Historical Resources Compliance Report (HRCR) to document the steps taken under the Reporting Required section above.
Peer Review
As with all actions carried out under the Section 106 PA and state-only projects, including responses and reporting of actions taken in regard to post review discoveries, all work is carried out by or under the direct supervision of a person or persons who meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards as set forth in Section 106 PA Attachment 1. Caltrans PQS certified at the Principal Investigator level in Pre-historic Archaeology and/or Historical Archaeology, as appropriate, peer review the Post Review Discovery documentation following the guidelines in Exhibit 2.14: Guidelines for Peer Review of Cultural Resources Reports. Peer reviewers’ names should be kept on record and comments retained in the project files. Chapter 2 Section 2-5.5 and Exhibit 2.11 Table C contain additional guidance on peer reviews and reviews for approvals.
