- Division of Environmental Analysis
- SER Home
- Purpose of the SER
- How To Use The SER - Printing Problems? Site Organization; Trouble with Acrobat Reader
- Topics Matrices
- Env Handbooks
- Other Guidance
- Forms & Templates
- Policy Memos
- MOUs/MOAs- NEPA/404
- Scoping Tools
PEAR - Caltrans Use
PES Form - Local Agency Use - USCoE Nationwide Permits
- FHWA Review Timelines
- Glossary
- ADA
- Contact SER Staff
- Questions about the SER?
- Caltrans staff - contact the Environmental Coodinator for your district.
- Local agency staff - contact the Caltrans
Local Assistance Engineer for your district.
- Suggestions or problems with this site, email the or use the suggestion form.
This site is produced by the Caltrans Division of Environmental Analysis (DEA) and Division of Local Assistance (DLA).
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view and print PDF files. Adobe Acrobat is required to edit online forms and save them to your computer.

Last Updated: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:32 AM
Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)/Memoranda of Agreement (MOA)
NEPA DELEGATION
- Section 6005 MOU with Federal Highway Administration
- Section 6004 MOU with Federal Highway Administration
- State Assumption of Responsibility for Categorical Exclusions
- FHWA has notified all relevant federal agencies about pertinent changes in consultation procedures as a result of Caltrans' assumption of federal categorical exclusion responsibilities, including:
Statewide Programmatic Agreements
- For Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluations see Chapter 20 - Section 4(f)
- For Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Agreement see Chapter 30– Categorical Exclusions
Biological - Mitigation Planning
Programmatic
Biological Opinion on the Effects of Minor Transportation
Projects on the San Joaquin Kit Fox, Giant Kangaroo Rat,
Tipton Kangaroo Rat, Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard, California
Jewelflower, San Joaquin Woolly-threads, Bakersfield Cactus,
and Recommendations for the San Joaquin Antelope Squirrel.
(12.5MB). Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) programmatic
biological opinion based on the Federal Highway Administration's
(FHWA) proposed minor transportation projects in Fresno,
Kern, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Stanislaus, San Joaquin,
Tulare, and Tuolurnne counties, California and their effects
on the aforementioned endangered species.
Planning
Guidelines for Standard Approaches to Mitigation Site Monitoring
and Maintenance (1991)
(282 KB) - This MOU estables the success criteria, monitoring
and maintenace of mitigation sites, and guarantees that
financial resources are available to provide remedial site
work and alternate mitigation, if necessary.
Biological - Statewide
Fish
and Wildlife Service (1988)
(578 KB) - The purpose of this MOU is to establish procedures
for the early and continuous coordination of transportation
project development activities between Caltrans and the
Service.
Fish
and Game (1990)
(354 KB) - Early Mitigation Planning for Transportation
Improvements in California.
Memorandum
of Agreement, Early Mitigation Planning for Transportation
Improvements in California (1990)
(219 KB) - Establishes procedures for endangered and threatened
species consultation between Caltrans, FHWA, DFG, FWS and
the Corps.
Biological - District/Region - all files

| Programmatic Document | Date | Area(s) Covered - Comments | Status |
| SECTION 7 - FHWA | |||
| Giant Garter Snake | 1-24-05 | Within the geographic range of the giant garter snake in the California counties of Butte, Colusa, Glenn, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Solano, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba. Programmatic covers small highway projects, as defined, with relatively small effects on the snake, is determined to be non-growth inducing or facilitating and meets specific "Project Design Criteria". | ACTIVE |
| Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle | 3-11-97 | “Generally” Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys. A total of 250 elderberry plants, each with at least one stem measuring one-inch or greater at ground level, or 2,000 elderberry stems measuring one-inch or greater in diameter at ground level may be impacted in a six-month period. No designated critical habitat can be affected. | ACTIVE |
| 1 Desert Tortoise (hwy maintenance) | 8-4-95 | Portions of Kern, Inyo counties (Districts 6 and 9). Covered in portions of Kern and Inyo Counties. Two desert tortoises per year may be taken in the form of direct mortality. Twenty desert tortoises per year may be taken in the form of harassment through moving tortoises from harm's way during highway maintenance activities. | ACTIVE |
| 2 Desert Tortoise (hwy maintenance) | 9-28-94 | Most State Routes within District 8 | ACTIVE |
| California Red-legged Frog | 4-24-03 | Covers projects meeting four "suitability criteria." The first criterion is that the project "do[es] not contribute to a decline of the species in the affected area." This programmatic is applicable within the jurisdiction of Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office: San Benito, Santa Cruz, Monterey, Santa Barbara and Ventura counties, also portions of San Luis Obispo and Los Angeles counties. | ACTIVE |
| SECTION 7 - USACOE | |||
| Listed Vernal Pool Crustaceans | 2-28-96 | Within the Jurisdiction of the USFWS Sacramento Field Office - generally Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys. Take of species is permitted in up to 50 acres of habitat within an unspecified time period. | ACTIVE |
| Giant Garter Snake | 11-13-97 | Within Butte, Colusa, Glenn, Fresno, Merced, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter and Yolo Counties. Per year, a permanent loss of up to 50 acres of habitat and snakes within up to 250 acres can be impacted. | ACTIVE |
| Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle | 9-19-96 | Within the Jurisdiction of the USFWS Sacramento Field Office | ACTIVE |
| SECTION 7 - NOAA Fisheries | |||
| Programmatic Biological Opinion on the issuance of section 10(a)(1)(A) scientific research permits for take of threatened fish species | 10-22-2002 | For threatened Central California Coast coho salmon, threatened Southern Oregon/Northern California Coasts coho salmon, threatened California Coastal Chinook salmon, threatened Central California Coast steelhead, and threatened Northern California steelhead. | ACTIVE |
| SECTION 1601 - MOU's and Maintenance Agreements with Department | |||
| 8-21-03 | District 12 | Active to 8/21/05 | |
| MOU | 9-27-00 | District 3 | Expired on 9/27/01 |
| MOU | 11-12-97 | District 5 (Santa Barbara Co.) | ACTIVE to 12/31/02 |
| MOU | 10-10-97 | District 5 (San Luis Obispo, Monterey, and San Benito Counties) | ACTIVE to 6/30/02 |
| Maintenance Agreement | 04-22-03 | District 8 | ACTIVE to 04/22/05 |
| Maintenance Agreement | 10-29-02 | District 7 (L.A. and Ventura Counties) | ACTIVE to 12/31/03 |
| Maintenance Agreement | 3-1-99 | District 6 | ACTIVE to 3/1/04 |
| Maintenance Agreement for Test Bore Drilling | 10-28-99 | Districts 5, 6, 9, and 10 (Central Region) | ACTIVE to 10/28/04 |
| MOAs with Department of Fish and Game | |||
| Mohave Ground Squirrel, Desert Tortoise | 4-1992 | Includes amendment and correspondence | Expired in 1999 |
| Pilgrim Creek Mitigation Bank | 9-1999 | ||
| Rancho San Diego Mitigation Bank | 1-1996 | ||
| D-11 Various Parcels Mitigation Bank | 3-1999 | ||
| Beach Lake Mitigation Bank | 5-1991 | ||
| 1, 2
Standard Section 7’s covering programmatic activities;
2 Includes clarification letter from
USFWS dated August 1, 1995; 3 Update
in progress
Contributors: HQ: R. Hill; D3: C. Brown; D5: T. Edell, D. Hacker, and G. Ruggerone; D6: V. VonBerg; D8: T. Moore; D-10: S. Abafo; D-12: K. Ketelsa; DFG: Jack Miller (Region 1) |
|||
NEPA/404 Integration Process - Current MOU, Procedures and Memos
NEPA/404
MOU (2006)
(281 KB)
OLD MOU Procedures (Note: For general information only.
Superceded by April 2006 MOU. )
Guidance
Papers to Facilitate the Implementation of the MOU for the
NEPA and Section 404 Integration Process for Surface Transportation
Projects in Arizona, California, and Nevada.
US Coast Guard Bridge Permits
- FHWA/USCG
MOU, procedures, guidelines (links to a scanned
memo of poor quality)

- USCoE/USCG MOA, January 22, 1982
- General information
on USCG Bridge Administration

- A list of USCG Bridge
Guide Clearances
- FHWA regulation Navigational
Clearances for Bridges

- Also see Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 Section 9
